Pros and cons of indias vote

We know that elections of state governments of different states conducted by the election commission in every 6 months, this causes wastage of lot of money and time so I think government take a decision to conducting the election of states and central government at the same time, we know that it is difficult to conduct but not impossible.

It has many benefits like saving money, saving time. These laws were adopted inwith Queensland leading the way with the first compulsory laws in For example, the right to free speech carries with it the obligation to exercise it responsibly.

However, when made compulsory, voting becomes less than a right, especially when there is some penalty attached to failure to vote. Pakistan not only rejected the vote but, even introduced a motion to remove the entire clause of international enquiry body.

Get Started

Time is always a good healer. India had always maintained a stature of Non Aligned Country and look to avoid any involvement in the internal affairs of other countries, but this voting pattern has severely dented that image which was carved and niched by Foreign Affairs expert Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru.

They are usually seen spending before the model code of conduct comes into play. Effective steps must be taken against the offenders who were responsible for the atrocities, set loose upon the unarmed civilians and they must be punished according to the rule of law.

So friends I would like to say that conduct central and state election parallely. When elections are around the corners, most political parties throw gimmicks to gain vote bank or to destroy the reputation of the other party.

The end result would typically be a similar result except for the voter turnout percentage. The Netherlands government removed the policy in They know they are accountable for the actions of their party member Pros and cons of indias vote anything going wrong could mean snatching of their powers.

Holding simultaneous elections will ensure consistency, continuity and governance, and elections then will only be the means to achieve this and not an end in themselves.

Feb 21, Yes, I extend my great support to this issue, as we know that in our country every year there will be some election like assembly, loksabh, grampanchyat, municipality election and much more do we really need this? Could itself popularize a governing body without the requirement of these campaigning.

William Galston, senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution. Higher voter turnout occurs, but the results wind up being similar in many circumstances.

Thus India had done a commendable job by not supporting the vote there by protecting even its sovereignty. Express your positive attitude towards providing the solution.

Filters & Hot Topics:

The answer will be real simple that Uncle Sam was unable to place a firm foot in the Island nation, while the Government of Sri Lanka were fostering and nurturing their relations with countries which have been hostile with USA Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, etc.

S on human rights issue in Sri Lanka. In our country state government election and centeral national govt election held after 5 year of interval at different time.

The citizens get a card for participating in the voting process. Venezuela put an end to the compulsory voting process in and witnessed a 30 percent drop in the turnout rate. The International community must look in to the long term prospect of the building the nation to its zenith rather than involving in petty politics and gaining fame.

PM Modi has always been calling for uniting the state and general elections to compromise on the cost of holding the elections and reducing the chaos attached with it.

How to Write a Summary of an Article? Security will be major concern to center government. Eradicate the corruption from our country.

So it is not possible to employ force in every state for the election because there is only companies of paramilitary force are available as of now while companies are required.

Pros and Cons of India’s vote in the US sponsored UNHRC Resolution against Sri Lanka.

It is a welcome stand by the Government, even though it happened after a tough political lobbying between the regional parties of Tamil Nadu. It Is Still A System Of Independence Although voters are compelled to come to their polling place, the votes that they cast are still secret.

Personal opinions are still allowed with these laws and any valid candidate will still receive a vote, but apathy through not voting no longer is an election. The process becomes similar to that of jury duty, paying taxes, having health care, or having children attend school.

Discuss the pros and cons of India's stand on human rights issue in Srilanka.

Aug 17, According to me, one India one election is a wonderful idea where we can have general elections and state assembly elections all together but it is very important now that we should have common census among all political parties of India.

However, in India, the turnout rates of the voters have never been more than 63 percent and the percentages of invalid votes have never been more than 3.

So it is not easy to handle election at the same time. We definitely lack funds to use for the right cause, but India cannot be called a poor nation, as we have loads of money with the rich and stronger section of the society under the cover of black money.

The other important aspect is that the Tamilans in the Sri Lanka are now being portrayed as Enemy of the State due to the humiliation of the country in the world arena by the Sinhalese people, which will lead to the increase in the rift between the various communities, rather than improving their co existence and starting of the reconstruction of the nation.

But the question arises if it is fruitful! If we try to conduct one election in one Nation then large sum of money can be saved if conducted successfully but if fails due to any reason more money will be wasted than now.

Forcing them to vote explicitly denies them their freedom of religious practice.Pros and Cons of Indias Vote in the Unhrc Resolution Pros and Cons of India’s vote in the US sponsored UNHRC Resolution against Sri Lanka. India finally has taken a stand and voted for the US sponsored resolution at the United.

The Onion evaluates the pros and cons of making voting compulsory. Only about 40 percent of eligible Americans vote in a typical midterm election and around 60 percent in a presidential election, leading some to suggest the U.S. follow other countries’ lead and make voting compulsory, while critics warn it could have negative consequences.

PROs of IRV/RCV. Promotes majority support - The voting continues until one candidate has the majority of votes, so the final winner has support of the majority of voters. Discourages negative campaigning - Candidates who use negative campaigning may lose the second choice vote of those whose first choice was treated poorly.

A vote still counts for something, even if that vote is obtained in a way that is different than many traditional methods.

Top 7 Indian Government Apps, Pros and Cons

There are definitely some advantages to this system of voting and there are some disadvantages as well. Pros and Cons of India’s vote in the US sponsored UNHRC Resolution against Sri Lanka. Feb 07,  · Pros and cons of compulsory voting India is a democratic country. Voting is a fundamental right conferred to the citizens of the country by the Indian Constitution.

Download
Pros and cons of indias vote
Rated 5/5 based on 83 review